← Research library

Laboratory and human research

Antiplaque, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory properties of triclosan mouthrinses in combination with zinc citrate or polyvinylmethylether maleic acid (PVM-MA) copolymer.

European journal of oral sciences · 1996

Explore connections

What was studied

Combination mouthrinse inhibited plaque versus placebo; separate SLS skin test found reduced inflammatory response with triclosan/zinc formulation. Mixture and oral plaque endpoint. Skin irritation model does not isolate zinc citrate. No unsupported sample, duration or randomization claim.

Checked against the published abstract on Oct 1, 2026. Source 1 ↗Source 2 ↗

Abstract

The antibacterial agent triclosan has demonstrated antiplaque and antigingivitis activity in several clinical studies. Retention of antiplaque agents is of significance for their clinical effect. Triclosan has a relatively rapid clearance from the oral cavity, and attempts have been made to increase its oral retention. In the present clinical antiplaque study, it was found that 0.5% copolymer polyvinyl-methylether maleic acid (PVM-MA) or 0.5% zinc citrate, which are both added to commercial products, inhibited plaque formation to a similar degree when used in combination with 0.3% triclosan, 1.5% sodium lauryl sulfate (SL.S) and diluted propylene glycol (PG) in water (1:8). Plaque inhibition was significantly improved compared to a placebo solution. It was shown that these results could not be explained by an increase in antibacterial activity or by a change in the critical micellar concentration. The effect of the same solutions on SLS-induced inflammation on skin was also tested. It was seen that the triclosan/ zinc citrate solution and the control (triclosan/ethanol) decreased the inflammatory response, whereas the solutions containing triclosan in either propylene glycol (PG) or copolymer/PG did not exhibit any anti-inflammatory capacity.

Linked ingredients